Archives
Archives
| From: | Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Was: Getting Important Updates To Users) | ||
| Date: | Sat, 05 Nov 2005 05:09:21 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200511051408.09014.jstubbs@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Was: Getting Important Updates To Users) by Alec Joseph Warner |
||
| 1 | On Saturday 05 November 2005 03:53, Alec Joseph Warner wrote: |
| 2 | > As far as including news in the tree goes, news is repository bound |
| 3 | > information. Each repository may in fact have relevant news, and in |
| 4 | > preparation for multiple repositories this is how the news should be |
| 5 | > handled. It goes with the rest of the repo-specific information. That |
| 6 | > is why it should be in the tree. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I seem to be repeating myself... What's an example of repository-specific |
| 9 | non-package-specific news? Why does `emerge --changelog` not suffice for |
| 10 | package-specific news? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Jason Stubbs |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Was: Getting Important Updates To Users) | Alec Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GLEP 42 (Was: Getting Important Updates To Users) | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Was: Getting Important Updates To Users) | Michiel de Bruijne <m.debruijne@××××××.nl> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Was: Getting Important Updates To Users) | R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> |