| 1 |
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 12:09, David Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> ends. Gentoo 'appears' to have strong connections to IBM, which to me |
| 4 |
> contradicts their .org status. These are some of many reasons why I think |
| 5 |
> that if gentoo want to be a .org they need to explain who they are, hence |
| 6 |
> the need for a social contract. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I think you might be confused by the existence of the gentoo.com domain |
| 10 |
name. Please review this entire thread |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/2001-September/006795.html |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
There can also be found threads in the archives debating the relative |
| 15 |
merits and requirements of various licenses. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Unless drobbins feels the need to clarify his position to you, I'm |
| 18 |
afraid the information provided to you will have to suffice. If this is |
| 19 |
not sufficient, I have formed the impression (rightly or wrongly) that |
| 20 |
you would probably be more comfortable using and contributing to Debian. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Best of Luck, |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
tod |
Archives