Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs?
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:27:41
Message-Id: 1190420176.9730.14.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs? by Mike Frysinger
1 On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 17:45 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > the compromise is simple: catalyst runs --config at the end of stage3 for
3 > appropriate packages, but as to what those things actually do is left in the
4 > ebuilds.
5
6 I've already stated my preference for not doing *anything* outside of
7 merging packages in the stages. Were this >stage3, I wouldn't care.
8 Anyway, I'd much rather leave everything as it is now than add the
9 emerge --config stuff. You're free to add it to the ebuilds, of course,
10 which would satisfy the people that want it, but I would prefer not add
11 it to the stages, even if it is documented in the Handbook, as it isn't
12 required. Basically, I'd rather we either throw it into the earlier
13 stages, or not do it at all. You've given good reason on why, while
14 technically feasible since we're only caring about bash at this time, it
15 is still a bad idea as it opens us up to yet another slippery slope. I
16 completely see your point, which is why I'm taking the stance that
17 things are best left as they are now.
18
19 --
20 Chris Gianelloni
21 Release Engineering Strategic Lead
22 Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
23 Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
24 Gentoo Foundation

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs? Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why isn't /root/.bash_profile in the stage tarballs? Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>