| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Matt Turner: |
| 5 |
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> Why do you send RFC out when you ignore comments? |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> I didn't see any comments suggesting any changes. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> There were 2. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I don't think there were. But I'll play along with your trolling. |
| 14 |
> A recap of the thread: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> 1) I asked what the differences were between git-2 and git-r3. No |
| 17 |
> suggestions. 2) You clarified that you are not against |
| 18 |
> shallow-clone support, just against it being the default. 3) ulm |
| 19 |
> agreed with you. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> and that was the thread before anything was committed. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Presumably you think your email was supposed to be interpreted as |
| 24 |
> a suggestion. It was not interpreted as such, because it wasn't a |
| 25 |
> suggestion. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Now please stop trolling. We're tired of it. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I am tired of talking to people who are unobjective. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
But to make it more clear to you: I don't think that removing shallow |
| 33 |
clone support is an improvement, so I vote against removing it. |
| 34 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
iQEbBAEBCgAGBQJTCp35AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz/nMH923woDMMVZv6kXQWn/1FXg/p |
| 37 |
BJbDv328j3qZWgEcPmA4RY5LIt+shUf8ymPaqfRdmDKV8E8lZht3ld/aMQYKhPLF |
| 38 |
8lftR+nwtcn0DlUVsTMnLPFl58S6u0Yp/k7/vVuw6qKXCUETMPjCzr6kZqLvO0c0 |
| 39 |
5nkGB6XlpNLN+WWBfx3z50UQV0xRcfV9t1nZgr9ohvPv3cvDDL3CBo2RxHYf2vY+ |
| 40 |
YJVBrGwL8iqwDs9fw+kV1v9RBlHJjaecvQSGqApgnT7b/Mv00101rbiHDf1zc7v1 |
| 41 |
5ugfr5NktervgxShPk0vP/4fbBwLARkwK9eFYnSRgZvG4Q5xJDFVg/7DdUVTTg== |
| 42 |
=Fr6g |
| 43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives