Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Axelsson <smiler@××××××××××.nu>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] stable and unstable branches.
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 23:32:27
Message-Id: 20020724063223.25c7e7d1.smiler@lanil.mine.nu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] stable and unstable branches. by Christian Bartl
1 How about mask the "unstable" ebuilds in the stable distribution?
2 That provides a simple solution for the Debian problem. If you want that
3 new bleeding edge ebuild, just unmask it on your own risk. It will probably
4 just be as stable as it is today.
5 But to talk against myself on this:
6
7 GenToo Linux is a distribution for powerusers by powerusers :)
8
9 And as mentioned in another mail in this thread; there's a bugzilla page: USE IT!
10 I've submitted alot of bugs already and I've only been using gentoo for a month and ALL
11 bugs have been solved within a day or two
12
13 --
14 Christian Axelsson
15 smiler@××××××××××.nu
16
17 --------------------
18 On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 23:31:36 +0200
19 Christian Bartl <psy-sec@×××.at> wrote:
20
21 > I don't think that it would be such a good idea.
22 > I can only speak for myself: As I love Gentoo, but don't have the time to test
23 > known unstable software I'm sure I would be the first user who never touches
24 > the unstable branch. I think Gentoo would get the same problems like GNU/Linux
25 > or Debian: Everyone waits for it getting officially stable and testing is has
26 > to be done by a few freaks.
27 > Whoever needs a stable Gentoo now only has to read the mailing-lists an knows
28 > about common problems.
29 > So you great developers: if you want to get you ports tested by many people
30 > don't tell the community (and me :-) that it isn't stable.
31 >
32 > best regards
33 > Christian
34 >
35 > At 22:06 23.07.2002 +0200, you wrote:
36 > >I think it should really be a very good idea to create two different
37 > >branches of the gentoo distribution. A stable and a unstalbe (or testing)
38 > >one. This becouse i usually find that some e-build simpy does not compile.
39 > >I know that it is a relly difficult task to get all the e-build working
40 > >right, but i also think that some people (like me) should prefer to work
41 > >with a little outdated packages that have been tested for some time,
42 > >instead of having to work with cutting edge packages that doesn't compile.
43 > >Don't get me wrong. I belive that gentoo is the best linux distro i have
44 > >ever seen, but this should really be an important way to go.
45 > >It also should be really easy to implement thanks to the possibility to
46 > >select different profiles.
47 > >So let me know what you think about this.
48 > >Thanks
49 > >
50 > >Stefano Peluchetti
51 > >
52 > >_______________________________________________
53 > >gentoo-dev mailing list
54 > >gentoo-dev@g.o
55 > >http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
56 > >
57 >
58 > _______________________________________________
59 > gentoo-dev mailing list
60 > gentoo-dev@g.o
61 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
62 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] stable and unstable branches. "Chad M. Huneycutt" <chad.huneycutt@×××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] stable and unstable branches. Alexander Gretencord <arutha@×××.de>