From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc | ||
Date: | Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:23:00 | ||
Message-Id: | 201210111522.17665.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc by Ben Kohler |
1 | On Thursday 11 October 2012 14:56:11 Ben Kohler wrote: |
2 | > I would like to suggest that the "server" profile variants |
3 | > (ie default/linux/amd64/10.0/server) be unlisted from profiles.desc, so |
4 | > that they do not show up in "eselect profile list" for new users. As far |
5 | > as I know, this server target is unmaintained, undesirable, and somewhat |
6 | > silly, if you look at its make.defaults. If this target is being kept |
7 | > around just so we don't break older setups, then simply removing from |
8 | > profiles.desc would allow these systems to keep using the profile, without |
9 | > presenting it as a viable option for new users. |
10 | |
11 | sounds like something to fix rather than punt. i don't know why you think |
12 | having server profiles is "undesirable", but i certainly desire it on many |
13 | systems. like servers. the desktop and developer profiles are not |
14 | appropriate. |
15 | -mike |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc | Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc | Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> |