1 |
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 05:16:48AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote |
2 |
|
3 |
> I hope that eudev wants to do the respectable thing for any fork, ie. |
4 |
> work hard to minimize the amount of wasted effort in both projects by |
5 |
> sharing much code and bugfixes. |
6 |
|
7 |
That would be nice if systemd/udev upstream was agreeable. On the |
8 |
other hand, if the systemd/udev maintainers had accepted bug reports |
9 |
("WONTFIX" is not acceptance) and had accepted proposed patches, there |
10 |
wouldn't have been a need for the eudev fork in the first place. |
11 |
Lennart Poettering has admitted systemd's outright hostility to to |
12 |
standalone udev... |
13 |
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html |
14 |
|
15 |
> Well, we intent to continue to make it possible to run udevd outside |
16 |
> of systemd. But that's about it. We will ***NOT POLISH THAT, OR ADD |
17 |
> NEW FEATURES*** to that or anything. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> OTOH we do polish behaviour of udev when used *within* systemd |
20 |
> however, and that's our primary focus. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> And what we will ***CERTAINLY NOT DO IS COMPROMISE THE UNIFORM |
23 |
> INTEGRATION INTO SYSTEMD FOR SOME COSMETIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR |
24 |
> NON-SYSTEMD SYSTEMS***. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> (Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case |
27 |
> you haven't noticed it yet. I am looking forward to the day when we |
28 |
> can drop that support entirely.) |
29 |
|
30 |
They've essentially announced ahead of time that most bugs from |
31 |
non-systemd users would be closed with WONTFIX. Actually, for political |
32 |
reasons, I hope that eudev does submit a bunch bugs+patches, and gets |
33 |
them rejected. Then whenever anyone complains about not sharing code, |
34 |
show them a bunch of WONTFIX emails from systemd/udev maintainers. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
38 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |