Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild copyright attribution?
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:38:20
Message-Id: 20040108113751.474edf7f@wallace
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild copyright attribution? by Jon Portnoy
1 On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:36:01 -0500
2 Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o> wrote:
3
4 >
5 > In another post in that thread, he said that he had consulted with his
6 > lawyer and dual copyrights were, indeed, a bad idea.
7 >
8
9 Hi,
10
11 I couldn't find this other post in my gentoo-dev archives. Could you
12 please quote it? Or, Daniel, could you reexplain the why please? That's
13 not that I want to restart this discussion, but I remember that in
14 August I had the fealing that it was not really concluded, and it seems
15 that I was not the only one. Also, I'm curious about the disavantages of
16 shared copyrights in US laws, because in France, it is really a good
17 thing, with no drawback I can think of.
18
19 Thanks a lot to take time to explain this again.
20
21 --
22 TGL.
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild copyright attribution? John Nilsson <john@×××××××.nu>
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild copyright attribution? Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>