Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: games@g.o, Gentoo Quality Assurance Team <qa@g.o>, "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" <mva@×××.name>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The request to abolish games team policy
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 22:26:57
Message-Id: CA+CSuAKpNxZ6i8+_rrgfvM8PifMDKgFpFX2zw1MBPEZtUEob3Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] The request to abolish games team policy by "Michał Górny"
1 Please do not take this personally.
2
3 I honestly wonder what all the fuss is about. There are a few games
4 I've helped with over the years and I've never had any trouble at all
5 having my stuff reviewed and accepted. And I'm a lousy ebuild writer.
6 Every time I'd suggest a fix, bump, or new package, and I came with an
7 ebuild, I would get constructive criticism and I could then commit it
8 myself. Not one single time did I get a "no". Not once.
9
10 You had a fix and it was refused? Have you ever considered you may
11 have been doing it wrong? I understand having to have your code
12 reviewed and accepted sounds like an insult to a rock star like you,
13 but that's the way it is in the real world. It is still beyond my
14 understanding that code reviews are not mandatory for anything that is
15 committed in Gentoo.
16
17 Rich, if I may have a suggestion, it would be that instead of meddling
18 with projects that have been doing their best with what they have for
19 years, and which need praise rather than hindrance, you instead start
20 a project to get people to think positively and accept criticism. The
21 amount of energy that was spent in this thread and many others in pure
22 loss could have gone a long way.
23
24 Denis.

Replies