| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thus, not adding it to @system in no way means it's not considered |
| 3 |
> mandatory for a normal install, it just means the ultimate goal is to |
| 4 |
> have all the deps specified and nothing left in @system, and while |
| 5 |
> progress isn't fast by a long shot, the first thing is to ensure we're |
| 6 |
> not regressing! |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
If the ultimate goal is to eliminate @system entirely (which it |
| 10 |
probably isn't), we will need to revisit the way stage building works. |
| 11 |
If understand correctly, a stage3 contains @system and its |
| 12 |
dependencies. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The smallest you can really make @system under that circumstance would |
| 15 |
be a working toolchain and the utilities necessary to build any other |
| 16 |
needed packages. I think that is the goal that most people have been |
| 17 |
shooting for lately. |
Archives