1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
a bit out of topic (sorry in advance) but connect to eventually new portage |
4 |
feature... |
5 |
|
6 |
for both portage and your fork I think that could be interesting add an |
7 |
extension to PMS for define inside profiles or targets masking of packages |
8 |
of a particular repslository. Currently PMS doesn't permit this but have |
9 |
this feature could be help users to define our profiles under overlays. |
10 |
|
11 |
Something like this: |
12 |
|
13 |
sys-devel/gcc::gentoo |
14 |
|
15 |
Currently this is permitted only under /etc/portage but for distro based of |
16 |
gentoo or others use cases share our profiles directly under overlay could |
17 |
permit an easy and elegant way to share our customizations. |
18 |
|
19 |
Unlucky this break specifications but I think that could be a fine new |
20 |
feature. |
21 |
|
22 |
wdyt? |
23 |
|
24 |
My cent. |
25 |
|
26 |
G. |
27 |
|
28 |
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 23:06 Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
29 |
|
30 |
> W dniu pią, 23.03.2018 o godzinie 00∶47 +0300, użytkownik Consus |
31 |
> napisał: |
32 |
> > On 20:03 Thu 22 Mar, Michał Górny wrote: |
33 |
> > > Hello, everyone. |
34 |
> > > |
35 |
> > > After 2+ years of repeating disagreements with Portage maintainer(s) |
36 |
> > > I have finally decided to fork Portage. My little fork uses technical |
37 |
> > > name of 'portage[mgorny]' [1] (to distinguish it from mainline |
38 |
> Portage), |
39 |
> > > and aims to focus on cleaning up code and adding useful features with |
40 |
> > > less concern for infinite bug-by-bug compatibility. |
41 |
> > > |
42 |
> > > Detailed rationale in README [2]. |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> > Do you have any roadmap? |
45 |
> > |
46 |
> |
47 |
> No. Just a few general ideas. It's Portage, so I don't expect anything |
48 |
> major to be able to happen. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> -- |
51 |
> Best regards, |
52 |
> Michał Górny |
53 |
> |
54 |
> |
55 |
> |