From: | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] RFC: Graveyard project | ||
Date: | Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:20:15 | ||
Message-Id: | 511D7F2D.1050208@flameeyes.eu | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] RFC: Graveyard project by Rich Freeman |
1 | On 15/02/2013 01:15, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 | > How? We don't support overlays in the main tree. I could see a |
3 | > package maintainer being nice if pinged by an overlay maintainer and |
4 | > delaying some change for a short time to let an overlay be updated, |
5 | > but issues that impact overlays should not be considered blockers on |
6 | > closing bugs on the main tree. |
7 | |
8 | The problem is when you have to triple-check that the user hasn't |
9 | enabled some random fucked up overlay and you have to guess whether that |
10 | might be the cause of the problem. Yes it happens, not so rarely. |
11 | |
12 | > If there is something wrong with the proaudio overlay just don't use |
13 | > it. The same would apply to sunset. |
14 | |
15 | I don't use it; people still report bugs with it. |
16 | |
17 | -- |
18 | Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
19 | flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] RFC: Graveyard project | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] RFC: Graveyard project | Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] RFC: Graveyard project | Alexander Berntsen <alexander@××××××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] RFC: Graveyard project | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] RFC: Graveyard project | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |