1 |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:09:53PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
> * Can we find a better name than "the Proctors", please? |
3 |
> Yes, that's a completely petty point, but it was the first |
4 |
> one that came to mind. |
5 |
Suggestions welcome. We were stuck for other suitable names, and it was |
6 |
my own suggestion for proctors, based on the dictionary definition: "an |
7 |
official charged with various duties, esp. with the maintenance of good |
8 |
order." [1] |
9 |
|
10 |
I'm going to continue to use the term in my response here, for lack of anything |
11 |
else, but really, suggestions to the name are welcome. |
12 |
|
13 |
> * I highly recommend reading http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct |
14 |
> and our new doc side-by-side. The former provides strong, positive |
15 |
The Ubuntu guidelines are well-mirrored in the existing etiquette policy: |
16 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3&chap=2 |
17 |
Read them side by side (Ubuntu and the existing policy) is a little harder, as |
18 |
the layout is very different, but the core message is the same. |
19 |
|
20 |
However the existing policy has not worked. Reasons and theories behind why are |
21 |
rife within Gentoo. |
22 |
|
23 |
> > Any input will have to be received by Thursday, 15 March, 1200GMT in |
24 |
> > order to be useful; the Council will be voting on it later that day at |
25 |
> > 2100UTC. |
26 |
> * I understand the desire to act quickly, so that it appears that Gentoo |
27 |
> is doing something about this problem. However, I agree with those who |
28 |
> think that a few days isn't really enough time for an adequate |
29 |
> discussion. For this sort of policy to be effective, devs need to |
30 |
> agree with it. The Council can still make temporary rules on Thursday |
31 |
> while allowing the rest of the process to occur more leisurely. |
32 |
As the council, you have charged us with ensuring a technical direction for |
33 |
Gentoo. We are working on it, we really are. In the meantime, we saying that |
34 |
the buck stops here, because right now, Gentoo is being seriously damaged as a |
35 |
distribution. |
36 |
|
37 |
If these rules don't help matters in the short term, please really do bring |
38 |
another proposal (some hybrid of the Ubuntu CoC even), either to us, or the |
39 |
council that succeeds us. |
40 |
|
41 |
> * Having a group of folks separate from devrel who would be doing |
42 |
> similar things to what devrel does (when devrel isn't involved in |
43 |
> recruiting) somehow seems a bit silly. I'd much rather we just broaden |
44 |
> that part of Developer Relations to Community Relations. |
45 |
I'd to quote from Christel's mail here: |
46 |
"2. The Proctors is not a new name for Devrel. They would fall under |
47 |
Devrel territory, but as a newly formed group under the leadership and |
48 |
supervision of the Council. A decision as to numbers and electing |
49 |
proctors has not yet been reached -- we are working out these details as |
50 |
we speak. (My suggestion here is to select a group of people from a wide |
51 |
variety of backgrounds within Gentoo, taking care to avoid 'old boys |
52 |
clubs' and cliques)" |
53 |
|
54 |
Simply renaming devrel to commrel and handing them the task won't solve |
55 |
anything - there will still be complaints that devrel is being unfair (and is |
56 |
indeed why your Ombuds position exists). As the council, we will require of the |
57 |
Proctors that they are impartial and fair. |
58 |
|
59 |
> * Ubuntu requires that their devs sign a copy of their code of conduct. |
60 |
> (I assume an electronic signature suffices?) Would that be a good |
61 |
> idea for us to do something similar? I don't really have a strong |
62 |
> feeling one way or another. |
63 |
How do we enforce this on users (both those that were never developers |
64 |
as well as those that were ex-developers) fairly then? |
65 |
I see equal enforcement as a benefit here. |
66 |
|
67 |
[1] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/proctor |
68 |
|
69 |
-- |
70 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
71 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
72 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
73 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |