| 1 |
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:46:46AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 18:48, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Comments, suggestions and feedback are welcome. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
Perhaps a silly question, but why are patches rolled as their own kernels at |
| 6 |
all? Seems to my little brain (yes, it's real small when it comes to these |
| 7 |
matters) that it would almost make more sense to offer the vanilla kernel as |
| 8 |
is, then have each of these (currently their own ebuilds) patches as add on |
| 9 |
ebuilds, such as emerge vanillia-kernel, emerge grsecurity-patch, emerge |
| 10 |
nvidia-patch, etc. After all, it's not like the ebuild for the kernel |
| 11 |
compiles it in the first place, and as far as I know these patches |
| 12 |
add/replace to the existing structure, right? Just a random thought, feel |
| 13 |
free to ignore :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
| 20 |
| http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 21 |
| #gentoo-dev on irc.freenode.net |
| 22 |
Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.freenode.net |
| 23 |
Perl Guy | |
| 24 |
| GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E |
| 25 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives