1 |
On 09/12/2015 11:07 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:11:27PM +0200, hasufell wrote: |
3 |
>> We should probably auto-attach the patch from the pull request. This |
4 |
>> can easily be done with link-rewriting, e.g.: |
5 |
>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/83 to |
6 |
>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/83.patch |
7 |
>> yields a nice downloadable patch. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Why not [1]: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> $ GITHUB_REMOTE=origin # adjust this to match whatever you call GitHub's gentoo/gentoo |
12 |
> $ git config --add remote.$GITHUB_REMOTE.fetch +refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/$GITHUB_REMOTE/pr/* |
13 |
> |
14 |
> That will let you fetch the remote branch (e.g. origin/pr/83 assuming |
15 |
> ‘origin’ is your GitHub remote). That seems easier than copy/pasting |
16 |
> around commits and messing with ‘git am’ and other things that will |
17 |
> change the committer, which will in turn invalidate any commit |
18 |
> signatures (the patch seems to drop those anyway). |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
Because that is not a valid bug report. Patches must be attached to |
22 |
bugzilla. |