| 1 |
"Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr." <bsder@×××××××.org> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
[...] |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> At the very least, consider Perforce before Bitkeeper. Several of the |
| 6 |
> FreeBSD developers seem to use Perforce behind the scenes, and it hasn't |
| 7 |
> seemed to provoke even a fraction of the animosity that Bitkeeper does. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
"Gentoo Linux will never depend upon a piece of software unless it |
| 11 |
conforms to the GNU General Public License, GNU Lesser General |
| 12 |
Public License or some other license approved by the Open Source |
| 13 |
Initiative (OSI.)" -- http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/contract.xml |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I think we can cross Preforce/Bitkeeper off the list based on that. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Matt |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Matthew Kennedy |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
Archives