Archives
Archives
| From: | Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow | ||
| Date: | Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:06:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | 2fe1858c-ed53-e97c-a967-4e92888ad579@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow by Michael Palimaka |
||
| 1 | On 07/25/2017 02:28 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: |
| 2 | > Does a bug # really need to always be in the summary line? It can eat |
| 3 | > valuable characters and tags which are pretty popular are equally valid IMO. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I would prefer the summary to be informative without having bug ID at |
| 6 | all. Summary should describe the change ,not only "fixes XXX", the bug |
| 7 | reference belongs in body (tags) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 11 | OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 12 | fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow | Sam Jorna <wraeth@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow | Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |