| 1 |
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:42:28 +0400 |
| 2 |
Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> By formalizing I mean the following: call for and form PMS team. Team |
| 4 |
> must represent portage developers and could paludis and pkgcore. All |
| 5 |
> suggestions for PMS draft must go into bugzilla and after patch for |
| 6 |
> PMS is created PMS team members should vote on that patch. After |
| 7 |
> voting patch is applied or discarded. Until there are open bugs in |
| 8 |
> bugzilla council can not approve PMS. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
How would a voting system be better than the current "if anyone doesn't |
| 11 |
like it, don't commit it until whatever they don't like is fixed" |
| 12 |
process? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Do you think that the current proportion of patches that are rejected |
| 15 |
for PMS inclusion is too high or too low? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Do you think that the differences between the proportion of patches |
| 18 |
from 'Paludis people' that are accepted or rejected and the proportion |
| 19 |
of patches from 'Portage people' or 'Pkgcore people' indicates a |
| 20 |
problem? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives