1 |
Dave, I couldn't agree more. |
2 |
|
3 |
I never tried BSD myself, but I did try to coexist with Redhat and then |
4 |
SuSE and both left a bitter aftertaste. :) Whereas Redhat is sort of |
5 |
optimizable, SuSE was not very tractable in that regard. But sadly |
6 |
enough, both Redhat and SuSE are slowly but surely approaching Windoze. |
7 |
|
8 |
With Gentoo, not only can you tune and performance-optimize your box, you |
9 |
retain the feel and stability that is always advertised about Linux. |
10 |
|
11 |
I am getting brave enough to consider the idea of using Gentoo to deliver |
12 |
laptop-aided presentations for scientific seminars. I haven't researched |
13 |
that topic very much yet, but this is where stability and dependability |
14 |
would count the most for me - the ability not to worry that my Powerpoint |
15 |
in Windoze will crash during a talk. I haven't seen anyone present with a |
16 |
Linux laptop yet... Any of you tried it? I'd love to know!! |
17 |
|
18 |
Many thanks to Gentoo again... and Happy New Year to all :) |
19 |
|
20 |
Denis |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, David Hunter wrote: |
25 |
|
26 |
I just thought I would take the time to make the positive reply. |
27 |
GENTOO is the best distro I have ever used. I'm a BSD guy, and M$ (hate |
28 |
to say it) but Gentoo is good enough that my primary workstation at home |
29 |
is now gentoo, with XP on my secondary box. |
30 |
It just works. I understand it, there is no crazy archane structures, it |
31 |
just works. I used to use SuSE but as often as not, if I could do it on |
32 |
XP I would. Now, I only use XP as a back up. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
Dave |
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |