| 1 |
Err, i have read the whole thread and still does not get a point, why i |
| 2 |
am wrong. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
It's old battle like we have beforce with "gtk" meaning "any versions of |
| 5 |
GTK flag". This behaviour should be killed with fire. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Let's me reiterate some of the cases: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
1. Package can be build without Qt GUI at all, but either Qt4 or Qt5 can |
| 10 |
be chosen, but not both. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Fix this with REQUIRED_USE, do not enable any of Qt flags by default |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
2. Package can not be build without Qt GUI - either Qt4 or Qt5 is |
| 15 |
required, but not both |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Same thing here, different REQUIRED_USE operator. But - enable one of |
| 18 |
the flags by default to ease life of users. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
3. Package can be build with Qt4 or Qt5 or both AT THE SAME TIME(if such |
| 21 |
package even exists?) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Do not use REQUIRED_USE here, not needed. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Now, please tell me, where am i wrong? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
09.08.2015 23:08, Davide Pesavento пишет: |
| 28 |
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> wrote: |
| 29 |
>> <qa team lead hat> |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
>> In short - apropriate REQUIRED_USE with setting recommended |
| 32 |
>> USE-flag(e.g. USE="+qt4 qt5" or USE="qt4 +qt5") |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>> </qa team lead hat> |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>> That's most painless decision for both developers and users. Developers |
| 37 |
>> do not need to maintain ugly dependencies like |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> DEPEND="qt4 ? ( |
| 40 |
>> qt5 ( dev-qt/qtcore:5 ) |
| 41 |
>> !qt5 ( dev-qt/qtcore:4 ) |
| 42 |
>> ) |
| 43 |
>> ... |
| 44 |
>> " |
| 45 |
>> and other mess. |
| 46 |
>> |
| 47 |
>> </qa team lead hat> |
| 48 |
>> |
| 49 |
>> Users will have default behaviour for empty make.conf. If they adjust |
| 50 |
>> they make.conf to globally include/exclude some Qt-related USEs - they |
| 51 |
>> are already moving from default and that's why - they can add apropriate |
| 52 |
>> options to package.use |
| 53 |
>> |
| 54 |
> |
| 55 |
> Sergey, |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
> It seems you completely ignored the discussion that took place in this |
| 58 |
> thread (and I also think you misunderstood the scenario judging from |
| 59 |
> the example you gave). Therefore I'm sorry but I will ignore your |
| 60 |
> opinion as QA team lead. |
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
> Thanks, |
| 63 |
> Davide |
| 64 |
> |
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-- |
| 67 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 68 |
Gentoo developer |
| 69 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 70 |
Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead |
| 71 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives