| 1 |
On 11/07/2016 12:50 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> I think that is important to keep the group of people voting for |
| 3 |
> Council/Trustees the same as much as possible. Otherwise you're going |
| 4 |
> to get even more reluctance for the two bodies to work together. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Right, which would be done by requiring all foundation members to be |
| 7 |
developers. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The drawback of that is that it removes possibility of things like |
| 10 |
"sponsor"-level membership (which could be a non-voting membership class |
| 11 |
if bylaws are changed to accomodate it) but allow for corporate |
| 12 |
sponsorships in a structured manner if that is necessary on a |
| 13 |
subscription basis. So far it seems like there hasn't been much need for |
| 14 |
this, though. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 18 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 19 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives