| 1 |
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:46 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > The people behind the ban appear to be the usual suspects running |
| 4 |
> > ComRel/Council. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Yet another friendly warning: this kind of unsubstantiated got you |
| 7 |
> already time off the mailing list. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Can you please explain what I did wrong and point to the CoC to support |
| 11 |
your position? "Usual suspects" in this case is mgorny, ulm, dilfridge. |
| 12 |
Mgorny and ulm are on council, dilfridge runs ComRel. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
In the mean time, Luca, is ComRel planning to take an actions on mgorny's |
| 15 |
suggestion that William be shot? Even if tongue in cheek, I am sure you |
| 16 |
realize it's inappropriate. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Wltjr managed to get its longer time off the ml because of its repeated |
| 19 |
> small breaches of the CoC and ban evasions. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> You seem to try to follow his lead with all your strength. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Could you please explain your comment that I am trying to "follow his lead |
| 25 |
with all [my] strength"? And explain how this comment is not worse from a |
| 26 |
CoC perspective than my "usual suspects" comment. If you call me out on |
| 27 |
"usual suspects", then you shouldn't make insinuations about me either. |
| 28 |
Either both comments are wrong or both insinuations are fair game on this |
| 29 |
list. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Please be consistent, and don't be part of the problem. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-Daniel |
Archives