Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] dispatch-conf
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 19:47:04
Message-Id: 20050601194711.GD32371@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] dispatch-conf by Grant Goodyear
1 Grant Goodyear wrote: [Wed Jun 01 2005, 02:38:51PM CDT]
2 > Dear all,
3 > Is dispatch-conf still "barely-maintained", meaning that nobody is
4 > really all that familiar with the code? Agriffis has suggested that we
5 > split dispatch-conf out of portage and either put it into gentoolkit or
6 > make it its own package, and see if we can get some help
7 > with maintaining it.
8
9 Brian tells me that the symlink bug is fixed in ~arch, and that he
10 doesn't object to breaking it out of portage. Any other thoughts?
11
12 -g2boojum-
13 --
14 Grant Goodyear
15 Gentoo Developer
16 g2boojum@g.o
17 http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
18 GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] dispatch-conf Paul Varner <fuzzyray@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] dispatch-conf Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] dispatch-conf LinuxGuy@×××.net