Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 20:37:33
Message-Id: 9c20ce88-1030-417c-9d96-ab6bf7e8b773@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
1 On 02/04/2018 22:29, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
2 > Daniel Robbins schrieb:
3 >> It is interesting that Gentoo comrel clamps down immediately on violations of
4 >> outsiders, but chronically ignores ongoing violations from Council members.
5 >
6 > Well we are all equals, but some are more equal than others. If you reach a
7 > certain status, then you can get away with things which ordinary folks can't.
8
9 Not really.
10
11 Comrel never received a complaint about ulm or mgorny behavior from
12 drobbins.
13
14 On the other hand drobbins seems to try to violate all the items in the
15 CoC on purpose even after he got warned about them.
16
17 lu

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Burden of proof Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>