| 1 |
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:40 PM, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12/02/18 23:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Can you provide us with an example when such a scenario has happened |
| 4 |
>> in the past 12 years of council, or is the above purely hypothetical? |
| 5 |
>> Because in the latter case it is not an actual problem that needs to |
| 6 |
>> be solved. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> It is not a game of Nomic that we're playing here, but we are trying |
| 9 |
>> to run a distro. IMHO precluding council members from participating in |
| 10 |
>> projects isn't helpful. Or do we really want a council that is sitting |
| 11 |
>> in an ivory tower, completely detached from the daily distro work? |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> Uhm, what's the difference .. the council already live in their own land |
| 14 |
> separate from most of the developers, and definitely from the user |
| 15 |
> community at large ? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Or at least, such is the perception .. [don't shoot the messenger and |
| 18 |
> all that] |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Such is your perception. Most developers just cast their votes, and |
| 22 |
hence the same council members keep getting re-elected. I doubt that |
| 23 |
would happen if most developers considered them aloof, especially |
| 24 |
since the Council has always attracted a significant number of |
| 25 |
election candidates. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
You can't judge something like this by mailing list posts. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Rich |
Archives