Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>, gentoo-project@l.g.o, Gentoo Council <council@g.o>, games@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:18:38
Message-Id: CAGfcS_mWuDTTXzAdND+RBjzqpn2RqD3v=Mh3UdXDPxnH-QthYg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
2 > Following up to this. I think the choice is between the two extremes
3 > of keeping the status quo and of changing all non-FHS locations, or
4 > some intermediate solution.
5
6 The value of keeping the status quo is that it is the status quo, IMO.
7 Tweaking it makes it no longer the status quo and it just means lot of
8 change for questionable value (again, IMO).
9
10 I'd just as soon do away with the games eclass altogether if we're
11 going to make a change. Then games become like any other package.
12 That is a state I think is worth changing for. If we're just going to
13 move one or two directories around, I don't really see why we need to
14 make everybody jump through hoops, unless those few directories are
15 causing major problems today.
16
17 Sometimes the compromise between two arguable positions isn't
18 something that makes sense to anybody. If we're going to change,
19 let's make sure that what we change to makes sense on its own.
20
21 --
22 Rich

Replies