1 |
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Following up to this. I think the choice is between the two extremes |
3 |
> of keeping the status quo and of changing all non-FHS locations, or |
4 |
> some intermediate solution. |
5 |
|
6 |
The value of keeping the status quo is that it is the status quo, IMO. |
7 |
Tweaking it makes it no longer the status quo and it just means lot of |
8 |
change for questionable value (again, IMO). |
9 |
|
10 |
I'd just as soon do away with the games eclass altogether if we're |
11 |
going to make a change. Then games become like any other package. |
12 |
That is a state I think is worth changing for. If we're just going to |
13 |
move one or two directories around, I don't really see why we need to |
14 |
make everybody jump through hoops, unless those few directories are |
15 |
causing major problems today. |
16 |
|
17 |
Sometimes the compromise between two arguable positions isn't |
18 |
something that makes sense to anybody. If we're going to change, |
19 |
let's make sure that what we change to makes sense on its own. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Rich |