1 |
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 03:42:52PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 3:19 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > Of course someone could push everything back to github; however, there |
5 |
> > is nothing we can do about that so that is completely moot for this |
6 |
> > discussion. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Well, what exactly does copilot have to do with anything? If the |
9 |
> concern is about copilot "misappropriating" Gentoo's code, then it |
10 |
> seems we agree that moving off of Github won't change anything. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The social contract talks about how "Gentoo will never depend upon |
13 |
> [proprietary software]." It doesn't mention anything about Gentoo not |
14 |
> enabling it/etc. In fact our policies allow proprietary software to |
15 |
> be in our repository (obviously with restrictions on mirroring/etc). |
16 |
> Some argue that this is enabling proprietary software, but even if so |
17 |
> we're not breaking any promises. |
18 |
|
19 |
Rich, |
20 |
|
21 |
The question is around the GPL specifically. |
22 |
|
23 |
the point is, are we as a project ok with copylot re-appropriating |
24 |
our GPL code, possibly to proprietary projects, which could be argued |
25 |
violates the GPL? |
26 |
|
27 |
http://giveupgithub.org |
28 |
|
29 |
If we are ok with this as a project, I guess that's fine, but I brought |
30 |
it up to get thoughts about that angle. |
31 |
|
32 |
William |