1 |
On 2016.11.10 12:12, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> |
3 |
|
4 |
[snip] |
5 |
|
6 |
> |
7 |
> > With the mergers, that confidence has been eroded. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Honestly, I think this is something you need to substantiate. |
10 |
> |
11 |
[snip] |
12 |
|
13 |
> -- |
14 |
> Rich |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
Rich, |
18 |
|
19 |
The raw data is ugly so its attached. |
20 |
|
21 |
At one time, in 2007, we had three, four counting Proctors project, doing |
22 |
separate jobs, now merged into comrel. It was clear when things were |
23 |
moving from mediation to disciplinary as a different project got involved. |
24 |
Separation of duties is in general, a good thing. |
25 |
|
26 |
Since the end of 2007, chosen so I can ignore the Omnibudsman and |
27 |
Proctors projects in the data gathering, comparing like roles with like |
28 |
roles in comrel today, the head count appears to have reduced from |
29 |
16 to 11. |
30 |
|
31 |
Even the head count reduction suggests that there is less role |
32 |
separation than there once was. |
33 |
|
34 |
The nature and volume of work at the end of 2007 remains classified, |
35 |
so its not possible to determine from outside comrel if this head count |
36 |
reduction has made things harder for comrel or not. Maybe we could |
37 |
have some anonymised stats from the end of 2007? |
38 |
|
39 |
Observing behaviour changes in the population at large, its my opinion |
40 |
that things have gotten worse rather that better over the last 10 years, |
41 |
so that comrel is probably understaffed. |
42 |
|
43 |
Special apologies to dilfridge. Nano doesn't want to paste an 'ΓΌ' so |
44 |
your name is mangled in the attachment. |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Regards, |
48 |
|
49 |
Roy Bamford |
50 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
51 |
elections |
52 |
gentoo-ops |
53 |
forum-mods |