1 |
Mark Knecht ha scritto: |
2 |
|
3 |
> The one thing I would respectfully suggest is that you carefully |
4 |
> build your own portage overlay. My experience with Gentoo over the |
5 |
> last few years is that there is a _anxiousness_ in the portage |
6 |
> maintainer area to move newer revisions of software into portage |
7 |
> quickly and then just as quickly to remove from portage what users are |
8 |
> currently using. |
9 |
|
10 |
Really? |
11 |
|
12 |
I am usually a bit annoyed by the contrary. On an almost 1-year old |
13 |
Kubuntu (8.04 Hardy Heron) I can find packages that are just barely x86 |
14 |
stable now on Gentoo. |
15 |
|
16 |
A couple of examples I am aware of: |
17 |
Firefox 3: stable just since one month on Gentoo x86, was included in KB8.04 |
18 |
Qtiplot: 0.9.x stable and working on KB8.04, all releases ~x86 (and a |
19 |
hell to compile on a stable system -still didn't manage to do it) in Gentoo. |
20 |
|
21 |
Python releases are often behind, and not mentioning KDE 4, which is |
22 |
even default on 8.10 Kubuntu and on Gentoo was still hardmasked last |
23 |
time I checked (but probably Gentoo is just right in this respect, |
24 |
everyone keeps telling me to wait before digging into KDE 4). |
25 |
|
26 |
I fully understand that there are good reasons for that, and that the |
27 |
meta-distribution status of Gentoo makes harder to check packages (and |
28 |
also that the Ubuntu folks wildly release unstable stuff... firefox 3 rc |
29 |
in 8.04, for example). I just feel that (stable) Gentoo is actually a |
30 |
bit *behind* the average Linux distribution in its revisions of software. |
31 |
|
32 |
Most importantly, I also feel that that's something new: when I first |
33 |
installed my system, more than 4 years ago, I felt it was *ahead*. I |
34 |
wonder if it's due just to the sheer increase of work required to test |
35 |
packages, or if there are decisions behind that (or if it's just me |
36 |
having false memories). |
37 |
|
38 |
m. |