1 |
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: |
2 |
> On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Thursday 11 February 2010 13:50:54 Walter Dnes wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:31:26AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>> On Donnerstag 11 Februar 2010, Roy Wright wrote: |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>>> IMO, mandatory semantic-desktop is a very good reason to find another |
12 |
>>>>> desktop manager (even after being my primary desktop for 7 years). |
13 |
>>>>> |
14 |
>>>> yeah good luck with that. Because gnome is moving in that direction |
15 |
>>>> too. |
16 |
>>>> |
17 |
>>>> |
18 |
>>> There are other desktops besides GNOME and KDE. Actually I prefer the |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>> ICEWM window manager. I was running a 1999 Dell 450mhz PIII with 128 |
21 |
>>> megs of *SYSTEM* ram until the summer of 2007. Let's just say that |
22 |
>>> GNOME and KDE were out of the question for me. On my current desktop, |
23 |
>>> ICEWM flies. But I also have a netbook, and again GNOME and KDE are not |
24 |
>>> usable. |
25 |
>>> |
26 |
>>> |
27 |
>>>> Seriously guys, you start sounding like luddites. Is new, must be bad. |
28 |
>>>> |
29 |
>>>> |
30 |
>>> Correction, is fat, bloated, and slow, must be bad. I wonder if |
31 |
>>> |
32 |
>>> Microsoft's anti-linux strategy is to have its agents infiltrate the |
33 |
>>> linux developer community, and turn linux into bloatware. |
34 |
>>> |
35 |
>> You have been corrected on this point so many times I now think you are |
36 |
>> just a stupid ass. |
37 |
>> |
38 |
>> It is not slow. |
39 |
>> |
40 |
>> You are the only one saying that. People who do use Nepomuk say that it is |
41 |
>> not slow and does not hog resources (initial scan excepted). |
42 |
>> |
43 |
> you can even tell nepomuk how much memory it is allowed to use ... |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
|
47 |
Can you nice the thing too? That would work. I set emerge to 5 and I |
48 |
can't even tell that emerge is running most of the time. There may be |
49 |
times when I can but it is rare. |
50 |
|
51 |
I just don't get this thing that indexing is a resource hog. I notice |
52 |
updatedb running at night. I have 329Gbs of "data" and updatedb only |
53 |
takes a few minutes. How is that a resource "hog"? My machine is not |
54 |
as old as some but it is slow going by the new machines that are out |
55 |
now. It's a AMD 2500+ with 2Gbs of ram. I have had Linux on machines |
56 |
as slow as 133MHz but never felt the need to disable indexing. |
57 |
|
58 |
Dale |
59 |
|
60 |
:-) :-) |