Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED]
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:17:13
Message-Id: CAC=wYCHODGwKEkvz48e4HGL3RNuRF=U33Tj5=-fTtaeFZ8hZvw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED] by Peter Humphrey
1 >
2 > > The Gentoo Handbook says to create a small unformatted partition at the
3 > > beginning of the (primary?) disk, then to create a FAT-32 partition for
4 > > /boot, then whatever other partitions are required.
5 >
6 > Another question answered: yes, it has to be the primary disk. I installed
7 > a
8 > small test system on another disk. It has its own FAT-32 /boot partition,
9 > in
10 > which I set up a similar directory structure to the main system's.
11 > Efibootmgr
12 > still insisted on adding the UEFI entry to the main set, in spite of my
13 > telling it to use the secondary disk. And the BIOS couldn't see the image
14 > on
15 > the secondary disk.
16 >
17
18 I found my BIOS didn't recognise the UEFI setup until it was
19 specified/setup by efibootmgr, so that checks out. What was the efibootmgr
20 command you were using for the second disk?
21
22 The conclusion is that, at least on this motherboard, there is precisely
23 > one
24 > set of UEFI boot images, and it lives on the primary disk of the system.
25 > Well,
26 > I haven't yet worked out how much of it is on the disk and how much in
27 > BIOS
28 > storage. The point remains, however, that I can't spread boot images over
29 > several disks.
30 >
31
32 That's pretty poor.
33
34 What does efibootmgr show?
35
36 I got the impression that I would be able to UEFI boot from multiple
37 different devices, eg a USB drive with UEFI as well as the hard disk.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED] Adam Carter <adamcarter3@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] UEFI data corruption? [FIXED] Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk>