| 1 |
On 04/25 07:38, Floyd Anderson wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Di, 25 Apr 17:47:22 +0200 |
| 3 |
> tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Hi, |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > currently I am using urxvt as my standard terminal |
| 7 |
> > application, which is FAST and reliable. |
| 8 |
> > But it only emulates 24bit colors if instructed so. |
| 9 |
> > It maps 24bit rgb to 256 color using a fast but not |
| 10 |
> > total correct formula to to do (which is no critism - |
| 11 |
> > its just the way ot is implemented). |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I googled qyite a bit to find 24color terminal |
| 14 |
> > emulators and the one, which came closer to |
| 15 |
> > what I want is sakure. |
| 16 |
> > But comparing the speed of sakura with urxvt |
| 17 |
> > (catting a long log file twice while measureing the time |
| 18 |
> > of the second cat) it shows that sakura needs |
| 19 |
> > six times more time than urxvt. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > Combining this with the compile sessions, which |
| 22 |
> > are one of the core features of Gentoo ;)))... |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > What I want is the "fastest" possible (...) |
| 25 |
> > terminal emulator supporting true color (24bit). |
| 26 |
> > I dont need fancy configuring options (two exception: |
| 27 |
> > TABS! and lightweighted) and I dont want KDE stuff (or |
| 28 |
> > any other bloated thing with thousands of dependencies...) |
| 29 |
> > I am simply using openbox. |
| 30 |
> > |
| 31 |
> > What are your experiences? |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> > Any hint is heartly welcome! Thanks ! |
| 34 |
> > |
| 35 |
> > Cheers |
| 36 |
> > Meino |
| 37 |
> > |
| 38 |
> > PS: The terminal emulator dont need to be part |
| 39 |
> > of Gentoo necessarily...if it is compilable |
| 40 |
> > by a human being withoyt super powers... ;) |
| 41 |
> > |
| 42 |
> I am using rxvt-unicode also as my main terminal emulator. Its true colour |
| 43 |
> emulation bothers me also but just only a little bit. |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> As a second one, xfce4-terminal runs here from time to time (seldom). A |
| 46 |
> quick time/cat test with a gcc-5.4.0 log file (approximately 25 MiB) shows |
| 47 |
> surprisingly that xfce4-terminal runs six time faster than rxvt-unicode. |
| 48 |
> Maybe one reason is that urxvt looks for URLs and email addresses to |
| 49 |
> colourising them. |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> Maybe you can get a suggestion from [1]. |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> References: |
| 55 |
> [1] <https://gist.github.com/XVilka/8346728> |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
> -- |
| 58 |
> Regards, |
| 59 |
> floyd |
| 60 |
> |
| 61 |
> |
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
Hi Floyd, |
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
thanks for the informations! :) |
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
A few minutes ago I emerged xfce4-terminal and tried the |
| 68 |
cat-time-test of yesterday: 29 secondes with xfce-terminal |
| 69 |
and 5 seconds with urxvt. Hmmmm... |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
You have got the reversed results compared with mine... |
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
What the heck slows down the output of the terminals on my |
| 74 |
Gentoo and only let urxvt shine? |
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
Cheers |
| 77 |
Meino |
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
PS: I found XVilka before. That's why I asked for some experiences |
| 80 |
of other users.... :) |
Archives