1 |
On 31/08/2016 02:08, Grant wrote: |
2 |
>>>> And why use exfat if you use linux? It is just not needed at all. |
3 |
>>> |
4 |
>>> I agree. If you want to transport something between Linux systems, |
5 |
>>> use ext2/3 and use "mount" options to handle the permission issues. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> You can't control ownership and permissions of existing files with mount |
8 |
>> options on a Linux filesystem. See man mount. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> |
11 |
> So in order to use a USB stick between multiple Gentoo systems with |
12 |
> ext2, I need to make sure my users have matching UIDs/GIDs? |
13 |
|
14 |
Yes |
15 |
|
16 |
The uids/gids/modes in the inodes themselves are the owners and perms, |
17 |
you cannot override them. |
18 |
|
19 |
So unless you have mode=666, you will need matching UIDs/GIDs (which is |
20 |
a royal massive pain in the butt to bring about without NIS or similar |
21 |
|
22 |
> I think |
23 |
> this is how I ended up on NTFS in the first place. |
24 |
|
25 |
Didn't we have this discussion about a year ago? Sounds familiar now |
26 |
|
27 |
> Is there a |
28 |
> filesystem that will make that unnecessary and exhibit better |
29 |
> reliability than NTFS? |
30 |
|
31 |
Yes, FAT. It works and works well. |
32 |
Or exFAT which is Microsoft's solution to the problem of very large |
33 |
files on FAT. |
34 |
|
35 |
Which NTFS system are you using? |
36 |
|
37 |
ntfs kernel module? It's quite dodgy and unsafe with writes |
38 |
ntfs-ng on fuse? I find that one quite solid |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
ntfs-ng does have an annoyance that has bitten me more than once. When |
42 |
ntfs-nf writes to an FS, it can get marked dirty. Somehow, when used in |
43 |
a Windows machine the driver there has issues with the FS. Remount it in |
44 |
Linux again and all is good. |
45 |
|
46 |
The cynic in me says that Microsoft didn'y implement their own FS spec |
47 |
properly whereas ntfs-ng did :-) |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
Alan McKinnon |
53 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |