1 |
On 29/2/20 11:31 pm, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 10:17 AM Daniel Frey <djqfrey@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> Yes, I'm aware linux does VLANs... I set up netifrc to do this (I |
4 |
>> already have some "smart" switches set up - not full layer 3.) I thought |
5 |
>> about running containers but if I ever have to do something like |
6 |
>> emergency maintenance on my server the whole LAN would be down. Seems |
7 |
>> like a no-brainer to have a tiny device like an RPi to do this. |
8 |
> Yup. It really depends on your requirements. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> My main LAN uses a Pi as a DHCP+DNS server, for exactly this reason. |
11 |
> I don't want to be replacing a hard drive in my server and now my |
12 |
> lights/TV/whatever don't work. OpenHab runs on a Pi for this reason |
13 |
> as well. |
14 |
|
15 |
Keep in mind that rpi are not the only cheap, capable arm hardware out |
16 |
there. |
17 |
|
18 |
I am using a number of odroid devices, including an N2 with a gentoo |
19 |
based kernel and a gentoo aarch64 userland. Its used for lxc containers |
20 |
for asterisk, dns, webdav, mail, calendaring and web running on the N2 |
21 |
backed by an Odroid HC2 moosefs cluster (though I am using an intel |
22 |
powered Odroid H2 for the master). |
23 |
|
24 |
Its all working rather well now the initial install/config stages are |
25 |
over. Part of the gain over the pi's is the use of eMMC storage over |
26 |
sdcards - almost 5 times faster in my tests. The 4G of ram has proven |
27 |
quite adequate so far - even the asterisk latency is better than my |
28 |
previous QEMU/KVM on intel setup. |
29 |
|
30 |
I have currently have rpi 1B, 3B and a zero and while the specs for the |
31 |
rpi4 are better ... its not the best out there. |
32 |
|
33 |
BillK |