Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Is it OK to get rid of app-alternatives/* ? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:10:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | Y+znxIkkPvNxLmOa@stitch | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Is it OK to get rid of app-alternatives/* ? by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | On 2023-02-15 08:11:46, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > If, as you say, it will eventually replace eselect, there is no more |
| 4 | > bloat, just different bloat. It's still just a bunch of symlinks, but |
| 5 | > managed differently. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Should be less, since you already have portage installed but not |
| 9 | necessarily eselect-whatever. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Is it OK to get rid of app-alternatives/* ? | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Is it OK to get rid of app-alternatives/* ? | Daniel Frey <djqfrey@×××××.com> |