| 1 |
Hello, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:05:26AM -0600, Dale wrote: |
| 4 |
> I have to disagree with this. I used to use Mandrake and Gentoo is a |
| 5 |
> *LOT* faster than Mandrake. I turned off a lot of unused services and |
| 6 |
> Mandrake was still pretty slow. This is especially true if you |
| 7 |
> customize all the flags you can. I suspect he will see a speed |
| 8 |
> difference. Plus he will know what is being installed and why. Gentoo |
| 9 |
> IMHO beats Mandrake and others by a long shot. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Well, yes, it may be faster a bit, like 1%, maybe 10%… But if one distro |
| 12 |
would be unbearable slow, gentoo would be too. It won't just be faster |
| 13 |
10 times, and yes, that 10% are nice, but not usually worth switching |
| 14 |
your distro. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Have a nice day |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Q: Why was Stonehenge abandoned? |
| 20 |
A: It wasn't IBM compatible. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Michal 'vorner' Vaner |
Archives