1 |
On Tuesday, 27 December 2016 15:19:29 GMT J. Roeleveld wrote: |
2 |
> On December 27, 2016 3:38:28 PM GMT+01:00, Peter Humphrey |
3 |
<peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
4 |
> >On Sunday, 18 December 2016 19:07:23 GMT J. Roeleveld wrote: |
5 |
> >> More important, how is the latest kmail behaving? |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >My first impression is one of horror. It's ghastly! |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> >I've never seen such profligate waste of screen space. I've attached a |
10 |
> >couple of screen shots to show you what I mean. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Thanks :) |
13 |
> |
14 |
> >Take the folder list, for example. I used to be able to show all those |
15 |
> >folders in one panel with no scroll-bars, with no difficulty reading |
16 |
> >them; now eight folders spill over. I may be able to find a more compact |
17 |
> >arrangement but this is the best I've managed so far. At least with |
18 |
> >kmail:4 I could tweak Qt settings to condense it; now nothing I do makes |
19 |
> >any improvement. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I would expect font settings. In kmail:4 there is a display part in the |
22 |
> settings menu. I never did anything directly with Qt to chamge anything. |
23 |
> I have too many folders anyway for it to fit (unless I would have a BIG |
24 |
> 4K screen...) |
25 |
|
26 |
You see how spaced out the folder list is? There's no setting for that in |
27 |
KMail as far as I can see. The Qt Configuration tool has an Interface tab. |
28 |
Under Global Strut you can set minimum width and height. The default is |
29 |
zero, giving Qt free rein to do what it likes, but I could set those to 1 |
30 |
and kmail:4 would tuck all those folder entries up so that they fitted |
31 |
without scrolling. It has no effect on kmail:5 though. |
32 |
|
33 |
> >Then the message view. Message.png shows what your message looks like |
34 |
> >in this version of KMail (the message I'm replying to now). This is with |
35 |
> >all the bells and whistles I can find switched off. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> That actually looks nice to me. Do the minus (-) blocks actually allow the |
38 |
> quotes to be folded up? |
39 |
|
40 |
To each his own of course, but for myself, I just want the text with some |
41 |
quoting. Yes the minus blocks do fold up, but all of them or none. There's |
42 |
no individual control. |
43 |
|
44 |
I found a new header selection. After switching it back from 5.2 style to |
45 |
Fancy, it's back the way I like it. |
46 |
|
47 |
> >Next, after I'd emerged kde-apps/kmai-16.12.0, it was incomplete. I had |
48 |
> >to |
49 |
> >install several other packages to complete it, including the import |
50 |
> >wizard. |
51 |
> >Rather than messing about, I just emerged kdepim-meta and had done with |
52 |
> >it. |
53 |
> > |
54 |
> >Even after doing that, I get "No backend available for spell checking," |
55 |
> >even |
56 |
> >though I've set everything up that I can see. Myspell and hunspell are |
57 |
> >both |
58 |
> >installed. |
59 |
> |
60 |
> Hmm... that's not nice. Then again, I only use spell check for documents. |
61 |
> Not emails. Never really trusted those ever since I saw dictionaries get |
62 |
> automatically ruined by 'do you want to add this word to the dictionary'. |
63 |
|
64 |
Kmail:4 used to default to Australian English, no matter how many times I |
65 |
reminded it I'm in the UK. This one has no back-end at all. |
66 |
|
67 |
--->8 |
68 |
|
69 |
> >Nothing to do with KMail, but the display of gkrellm has changed |
70 |
> >dramatically. I use its Invisible theme, which hasn't actually been |
71 |
> >invisible since the switch from KDE-3 to 4, but it had a plain, |
72 |
> >unobtrusive |
73 |
> >grey scheme and showed what I wanted to see, clearly and with no drama. |
74 |
> >Now, |
75 |
> >the chart backgrounds have changed from charcoal-grey to a dark red, |
76 |
> >and |
77 |
> >what was grey is now a dreadful salmon-pink. Of course I can't see the |
78 |
> >red |
79 |
> >traces any longer. Perhaps I'm missing a KDE or Qt component. |
80 |
> |
81 |
> Always possible. I tend to just install the meta stuff and be done with |
82 |
> it. |
83 |
|
84 |
I've found a lot more KDE-5 meta-packages and installed those, but they |
85 |
haven't helped with this. |
86 |
|
87 |
> >Oh, and when I start a reboot in KDE, akonadi crashes with a |
88 |
> >segmentation fault. |
89 |
> |
90 |
> That is a bug. Hope it gets ironed out soon. Maybe still busy indexing |
91 |
> your emails? |
92 |
|
93 |
Could be. I'll try leaving it for an hour or two. |
94 |
|
95 |
Since I wrote, I've noticed that the messages I imported from kmail archive |
96 |
are not all in the right folders - about 2000 have magically jumped from the |
97 |
Purchases folder to the inbox. I'm also seeing a reversion to that old |
98 |
problem of silly numbers of duplicates appearing in random places at random |
99 |
times. I had hoped that would be among the first things to be ironed out in |
100 |
the :5 version. |
101 |
|
102 |
> >I dare say version 16.12.0 of KMail-2 will make a decent platform for |
103 |
> >development, now that it's finally here, but a very great deal of work |
104 |
> >lies ahead. I can see that I'll be doing my fair share of shouting too, |
105 |
> >at it and at the devs. |
106 |
> |
107 |
> I'll try to get my desktop converted this week. And will join in the |
108 |
> bugreporting party. |
109 |
|
110 |
It would be good to have someone to compare notes with. |
111 |
|
112 |
--->8 |
113 |
|
114 |
> >I think I'll have to go down the pub to drown my sorrows. |
115 |
> |
116 |
> Just don't climb behind the wheel of a car afterwards.... |
117 |
|
118 |
No, it's just a wee stroll. Takes longer to get my shoes on. :-) |
119 |
|
120 |
-- |
121 |
Regards |
122 |
Peter |