1 |
On 1/19/07, b.n. <brullonulla@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Vlad Dogaru ha scritto: |
4 |
> > Hello, |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > I am recently growing fed up with strongly graphical applications |
7 |
> > causing my (admittedly quite old) computer to slow down to a crawl. I |
8 |
> > like the concept of Ratpoison and am thinking of switching to it, but |
9 |
> > could use a few tips for making the big change. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Buy a couple spare RAM modules. Surely I agree with your will to build a |
12 |
> minimalistic system, this will help anyway and it's a nice experience, |
13 |
> but RAM is quite cheap and is the magic elisir that allows outdated |
14 |
> machines to be still usable -the CPU is rarely a problem, unless you |
15 |
> often do something quite computationally intensive. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
I have 384 megs of RAM and no imediate possibility of buying more. I realise |
19 |
it is arguably sufficient for many lightweight applications, but, as I |
20 |
mentioned, it is becoming increasingly frustrating, even with the real power |
21 |
of Gentoo and Fluxbox (the two have changed my life -- literally). |
22 |
|
23 |
> I am especially looking for a browser to substitute Firefox (it's great, |
24 |
> > but quite a memory hog). I like links, what with its graphical |
25 |
> > capabilities, but it lacks tabs and that's a major downside in my |
26 |
> > vision. I've tried Conkeror for Firefox, but it's too Emacs-centric (vim |
27 |
> > person here) and also disables tabs (or maybe it's me -- I couldn't get |
28 |
> > them to work). |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Did you try Dillo? I don't know if it has tabs but it seems *very* |
31 |
> lightweight. |
32 |
> Otherwise maybe Opera? people insist in saying it's really fast and |
33 |
> light (and has tabs:as a matter of fact, Opera invented them!), but I |
34 |
> personally don't know. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
I read up on Dillo and it looks promising. I will try it. As for Opera, I |
38 |
used it on Windows for quite some time, but at one point I started to be |
39 |
annoyed by the numerous marginally useful (at least to me) features that got |
40 |
added. I still regard it as a great browser, comparable to Firefox, but not |
41 |
what I am looking for. |
42 |
|
43 |
> Any other tips or nifty programs you could link me to would be greatly |
44 |
> > appreciated, especially Ratpoison-related; For instance, C-t is too |
45 |
> > RSI-prone for my taste and conflicts with Firefox's new tab button (I |
46 |
> > want to switch, but I realise fx could prove irreplaceable, mainly due |
47 |
> > to the large userbase). |
48 |
> |
49 |
> Try to see what purposely lightweight distros like DamnSmallLinux, |
50 |
> VectorLinux and Puppy Linux install by default, I think you'll have a |
51 |
> good choice of lightweight packages. However as far as concerning |
52 |
> ratpoison, I know nothing... |
53 |
> |
54 |
> > How's my English? How about my Netiquette? |
55 |
> > Do mail me if something is wrong with my behaviour. Thank you. |
56 |
> |
57 |
> This is going to be the best sign of 2007 :) - I really appreciate this |
58 |
> kind of approach. |
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
Thanks. I really look forward to constructive critique. |
62 |
|
63 |
Vlad |
64 |
|
65 |
-- |
66 |
How's my English? How about my Netiquette? |
67 |
Do mail me if something is wrong with my behaviour. Thank you. |