1 |
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 15:30:07 Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Håkon Alstadheim wrote: |
3 |
> > << SNIP >> |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I'm running the machine for multi-media-use, and I would like to make |
6 |
> > sure that I tune the media-programs to leave sufficcient cpu to handle |
7 |
> > the odd house-keeping task, while at the same time doing as much |
8 |
> > post-processing for image and sound quality as possible. Is there a |
9 |
> > way to get top to make sense, or are there other tools you good people |
10 |
> > would recommend ? |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The only thing I can think of that may help is to use the nice command |
13 |
> to give some processes more or less priority. That may or may not help |
14 |
> you any but it is a thought. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Otherwise, I tend to agree with Alan. Leave it to the kernel. |
17 |
|
18 |
I thought of one thing that might help - perhaps the media apps in question |
19 |
are single threaded and might benefit from a different preemption model |
20 |
algorithm. Give the old-fashioned server model a try instead of desktop or |
21 |
low-latency desktop. It's worth a try, YMMV |
22 |
-- |
23 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |