| 1 |
On 23 August 2011, at 07:27, Joost Roeleveld wrote: |
| 2 |
> ... |
| 3 |
>> * found this blog-entry against systemd: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> http://monolight.cc/2011/05/the-systemd-fallacy/ |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I agree, it might be more useful on desktops ... so far I am still |
| 8 |
>> exploring and learning to get to the point to make a decision where and |
| 9 |
>> if to use. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I think it is more useful on desktops and laptops, which get rebooted |
| 12 |
> regularly. On a server that tends to run for months without a reboot, a fast |
| 13 |
> init-system is important. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> And I don't really see the point of D-BUS on a server either. All the services |
| 16 |
> that need to talk to each other already have working communication paths. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Reading that blog entry I found discouraging the idea that dbus might be required on my servers in the future, if systemd becomes popular with distros. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Stroller. |
Archives