1 |
On 2021-11-01, thelma@×××××××××××.com <thelma@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On 11/1/21 4:47 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: |
3 |
>> On 2021-11-01, thelma@×××××××××××.com <thelma@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> I format external nvme SSD (M.2) drive as NTFS on Windows (to store |
6 |
>>> some pictures etc.) But when I insert the drive on Linux box (it |
7 |
>>> has support for NTFS enabled) I get an error: |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Please define what you mean by "it has support for NTFS enabled". |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Are you running a v5.15 kernel with the new in-tree NTFS driver? |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Are you using the ntfs3g FUSE driver? |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> Are you using the old, read-only NTFS in-tree driver? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I'm using kernel: 5.4.72-gentoo |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Under: File systems: |
20 |
> DOS/FAT/NT Filesystems: |
21 |
> <*> MSDOS fs support |
22 |
> - <*> VFAT (Windows-95) fs support |
23 |
> - <*> NTFS file system support |
24 |
> - [*] NTFS write support |
25 |
> After installing sys-fs/ntfs3g |
26 |
> It keeps telling I don't have: |
27 |
> CONFIG_FUSE_FS: is not set when it should be. |
28 |
|
29 |
OK, that's what is referred to as the old read-only in-tree driver. It |
30 |
has had experimental write support for a long time, but people still |
31 |
call it "the read-only driver". Most people "in the know" seem to |
32 |
advise that the write support should not be used, and many advise not |
33 |
using that driver it at all. The ntfs-3g FUSE driver is usually |
34 |
recommended instead. |
35 |
|
36 |
> I think I need to enable: |
37 |
>< > FUSE (Filesystem in Userspace) support |
38 |
|
39 |
You need that if you want to use the ntfs-3g FUSE driver. |
40 |
|
41 |
IIRC, the ntfs-3g driver supports a number features that the old |
42 |
in-tree read-only driver (which you are using) does not. The |
43 |
"windows_name" option appears to be one of those. |
44 |
|
45 |
If you want to use the windows_name option, you'll probably have to |
46 |
disable the in-tree driver and use the ntfs-3g one. It might be |
47 |
possible to use ntfs-3g without disabling the in-tree driver, but that |
48 |
sounds like a good way to get confused... |
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Grant |