1 |
Hi list! |
2 |
|
3 |
you may remember my post recently[1] on 2.6.13 problems (it was very |
4 |
slow to run). This turned out to be a hyperthreaded issue[2], which was |
5 |
fixed by a couple of patches [3], [4]. |
6 |
|
7 |
However, I can't find a kernel that will run both a) hyperthreading and |
8 |
b) suspend / resume in a stable manner! |
9 |
|
10 |
Here's a little table to show what I mean. The c-state patch is the one |
11 |
required to get HT working. With it, suspend (to disk) doesn't work, |
12 |
without it, usability is crap! |
13 |
|
14 |
kernel c-state patch? SMP speed suspend general |
15 |
2.6.12-gr7 no fast untested stable |
16 |
---------- |
17 |
2.6.13-gr2 no slow stable stable |
18 |
2.6.13-gr2 yes fast unstable |
19 |
---------- |
20 |
2.6.13-gr3 no |
21 |
2.6.13-gr3 yes fast unstable unstable |
22 |
|
23 |
I can't yet post any of this on bugzilla.kernel.org because I'm not |
24 |
using vanilla sources. It would take more time that I have right now to |
25 |
try it all again with vanilla. |
26 |
|
27 |
So, my question is: Do I have to give up suspend? (I hope not, as when |
28 |
it does work it works great and only takes a few seconds to suspend / |
29 |
start up). Is it worth a bugzilla entry anywhere? |
30 |
|
31 |
[I'm using only the gentoo-sources for suspend, no extra patches or |
32 |
utilities. To suspend, I just type `echo shutdown > /sys/power/disk; |
33 |
echo disk > /sys/power/state` as root] |
34 |
|
35 |
I'm hoping there are some kernel guru's out there somewhere that can |
36 |
give me some pointers. |
37 |
|
38 |
Many thanks, |
39 |
|
40 |
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/141911 |
41 |
[2] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5165 |
42 |
[3] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5165#c16 |
43 |
[4] http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5165#c17 |
44 |
[5] 5? There is no 5! Why do you want 5?! |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au> |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |