| 1 |
On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 07:33:06 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> >> eix-test-obsolete |
| 4 |
> > Many thanks, it certainly seems to. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > It seems to do a bit more besides, unruly in its verboseness, but I |
| 7 |
> > won't bother trying to interpret the rest of its output. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> It's one reason I don't use it much. It spits out so much, it's about |
| 10 |
> overwhelming. Then again, it is usually pointing out the stuff that is |
| 11 |
> no longer needed in some file somewhere. Also, the longer you wait |
| 12 |
> between runs, the more it spits out. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> It seems you can't win with that thing. LOL |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You can win, by running it reasonably often and actually doing something |
| 17 |
about the output. Ignore a few lines and they soon become a few more, and |
| 18 |
then a few more still... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
"We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!" |
Archives