Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Botched Raid1 install | ||
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:31:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | CA+czFiCH2ijTAzNdVFj3Pyx9DUTO-3hsR_G7et6ztX9_s-U8hg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Botched Raid1 install by James |
||
| 1 | On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:23 PM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo <at> gmail.com> writes: |
| 3 | > I also intend to use ext4 for all 3 partitions, boot,root,swap; |
| 4 | > unless there exist a strong, compelling reason to use |
| 5 | > ext-2 for the boot partition ??? ease of recovery ? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | I gather that it's now possible to put your swap in a swap file on a |
| 8 | filesystem, as opposed to giving it its own partition, but...why? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | :wq |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Botched Raid1 install | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
| [gentoo-user] Re: Botched Raid1 install | James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> |