| 1 |
> > Can someone explain the great minimal breakout happening in portage or |
| 2 |
> > point me toward a link? Is USE="minimal" in make.conf the kind of |
| 3 |
> > thing you should do if you don't have a specific reason not to, or the |
| 4 |
> > kind of thing you shouldn't do unless you have a specific reason to. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > - Grant |
| 7 |
> The second one, but I can't come up with any possible reason for doing |
| 8 |
> so. The actual problem is that the flag has no 'real' global meaning, |
| 9 |
> which means that it might turn off some 'unnecessary' features in one |
| 10 |
> application and turn off one of the most useful in another. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> So don't gamble with it. :) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Ok, good to know. Can anyone report any packages they prefer to run |
| 15 |
with USE="minimal" ? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- Grant |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives