| 1 |
On 10/26/11 11:07, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:23:30 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> At first I thought that sometime that installed since Oct 12 was causing |
| 5 |
>> the segfault, so I tried unmerging the 350+ packages that had installed |
| 6 |
>> since then and listing them in package.mask, but that blew up in my face |
| 7 |
>> because I don't know a command that forces portage to ignore masked |
| 8 |
>> packages and install next-highest stable versions. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Mask higher versions in package mask |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> cat/pkg-version.you.want |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I did, but as I said there where 350+ of them. And every time I tried |
| 17 |
to emerge anything else, I couldn't because some package I needed was |
| 18 |
listed in package mask. I got the package list that I added to |
| 19 |
package.mask from /var/log/portage-logs for files dated from October 12 |
| 20 |
till 24. It was an epic fail. I couldn't even emerge -e world because |
| 21 |
of those stupid masked package versions... |
Archives