Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Meino.Cramer@×××.de
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: HTML5 player (YouTube) is a pain!...Alternatives?
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:55:42
Message-Id: 20161130065511.GE4842@solfire
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: HTML5 player (YouTube) is a pain!...Alternatives? by "J. Roeleveld"
1 J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> [16-11-30 07:28]:
2 > On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 07:08:45 AM Meino.Cramer@×××.de wrote:
3 > > J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> [16-11-30 06:48]:
4 > > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 05:33:15 AM Meino.Cramer@×××.de wrote:
5 > > > > Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com> [16-11-30 05:08]:
6 > > > > > Am Tue, 29 Nov 2016 07:42:16 +0100
7 > > > > >
8 > > > > > schrieb Meino.Cramer@×××.de:
9 > > > > > > I get sick of this [CESNORED] HTML5 stuff coming from YouTube!
10 > > > > > > Most of the videos while playayaingnaying arereare stututterutering
11 > > > > > > liiklike helellell.
12 > > > > > >
13 > > > > > > I tested a lot of HTML5 addons to fix that problem and googled
14 > > > > > > around the world but nothing helps. The only thing I found is an
15 > > > > > > iconic sentence, which is true in this case also:
16 > > > > > > "You are not alone...!".
17 > > > > > >
18 > > > > > > Is there any way to feed the stream from youtube direktly into
19 > > > > > > a not blown player like mpv/mplayer or such (I would prefer
20 > > > > > > not to load a complete gui (vlc) with any click again and again.)?
21 > > > > >
22 > > > > > For me it was just the other way around. HTML5 mode played much (very
23 > > > > > much!) more smooth than flash player. I opted in early by that time
24 > > > > > for
25 > > > > > switching YT to HTML5 player. This was for Chrome, of course, because
26 > > > > > by that time Firefox wasn't really compatible.
27 > > > > >
28 > > > > > You probably really should check your graphics stack. If you have an
29 > > > > > at
30 > > > > > least somewhat decent machine (something which was built during the
31 > > > > > last 5 years), you should have absolutely no problems playing videos
32 > > > > > in
33 > > > > > the HTML5 player. Even my aging machine in the office (which didn't
34 > > > > > play smooth videos in the flash player) runs full HD streaming videos
35 > > > > > smoothly in the HTML5 player - no stuttering, no blocking, no
36 > > > > > framedrops. This was different with the flash player which looked like
37 > > > > > it dropped every second frame in fullscreen mode - but at least it did
38 > > > > > not stutter due to that "optimization".
39 > > > > >
40 > > > > > Maybe give some information about your graphics stack and
41 > > > > > configuration...
42 > > > >
43 > > > > Hi Kai,
44 > > > >
45 > > > > I think that the hardware is not the problem, since downloading the
46 > > > > video and playing it offline had resulted in no problems ever...
47 > > > >
48 > > > > Cheers
49 > > > > Meino
50 > > >
51 > > > Meino,
52 > > >
53 > > > In one of your other emails, you mentioned that your ADSL is incapable of
54 > > > providing the full-HD stream.
55 > > > This could easily be the cause for the issues you are having with HTML5
56 > > > video as well. Maybe look into cache-options?
57 > > >
58 > > > --
59 > > > Joost
60 > >
61 > > Joost,
62 > >
63 > > did this (~/.config/mpv/mpv.config) with no positive effect.
64 > > I decreased the video resolution to <1280 (again via mpv.conf) which
65 > > helps to some degree.
66 > > Interesting is: It hangs always a the same points in the video if
67 > > playing the same video with different configurations.
68 > >
69 > > I called mpv with an url form the commandline and indeed it shows
70 > > "playing video" and "buffering" (at this point it hangs) alternateing.
71 > >
72 > > The FF problem was not only hangs but something like the following
73 > > sentence:
74 > >
75 > > Thehe quiquickkckick bkrowownwn foxoxfoxx joxujumumpjumpsumps
76 > > oveovrver thhehe lazazylazyzy dogog
77 > >
78 > > Somehow three steps forward and two backwards. The audio was never
79 > > effected though.
80 > >
81 > > With "Play with mpv" it """"only"""" hangs.
82 > >
83 > > Do I really need an new DSL contract with my provider becayse
84 > > FF has switched to HTML5 only?
85 > >
86 > > Can't be...or?
87 >
88 > It depends. (seriously)
89 >
90 > What you describe is what I get when I'm using my mobile connection with bad
91 > reception. In other words, it does sound like a bandwidth issue.
92 >
93 > Dave solves that by downloading the files and then watching it locally.
94 >
95 > What kind of bandwidth (up and down) do you have? And what else is using that
96 > connection while you are trying to watch a video?
97 >
98 > I don't think it's HTML5 at fault, the same amount of data needs to be
99 > transfered, but it might be that HTML5 is less bandwidth efficient than Flash.
100 >
101 > I don't seem to have flash installed on my current machine and am using FF45.5.
102 > In there, with Youtube, I do get the option to change the resolution on the
103 > video-streams. Don't you get that?
104 >
105 > --
106 > Joost
107 >
108
109 I checked the current bandwidth (07:48 am local time) with this
110 http://speedcheck.vodafone.de/
111
112 and got:
113 2,1 Mbps download
114 0,1 Mbps upload
115 58 ms latency (ping test)
116
117 There is no other kind of task which consumes bandwidth
118 (while checking the above or while streaming videos)
119
120 Another (real odd) possibillitu would be: Someone has
121 hijacked my DSL modem (its no router) - its an older
122 Fritz! box.
123
124 --
125 Meino

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: HTML5 player (YouTube) is a pain!...Alternatives? "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org>
[gentoo-user] Re: HTML5 player (YouTube) is a pain!...Alternatives? Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com>