1 |
On 03/02/2018 09:36 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: |
2 |
> These are all from Grant Taylor. They are DKIM-signed, and, not |
3 |
> surprisingly given the list header and footer munging, signature |
4 |
> verification fails (on my mail server). |
5 |
|
6 |
Correct. DKIM verification is failing and my DMARC policy is configured |
7 |
to REJECT messages that fail DKIM or SPF tests. |
8 |
|
9 |
The reason that messages are being rejected is because of the DMARC |
10 |
policy. 1) I publish DMARC records and 2) Gmail honor published DMARC |
11 |
records. |
12 |
|
13 |
The same type of problem will happen with any other sending domain that |
14 |
publishes REJECT records to a recipient where the receiving server |
15 |
honors said REJECT records. |
16 |
|
17 |
This is not just me. More and more sending domains are publishing DMARC |
18 |
records and more and more receiving servers are honoring said records. |
19 |
Further, multiple governments are mandating that governmental agencies |
20 |
and sub-contractors implement DMARC (which also means DKIM and SPF). |
21 |
The US and Germany come to mind immediately. - This is a growing |
22 |
change in the email industry. - I just happen to live towards (but not |
23 |
on) the bleeding edge of email. |
24 |
|
25 |
> Munging by lists should just die. Why do it? Windoze and Goo users may |
26 |
> have to split their mail into folders by Subject, but surely Gentooers |
27 |
> know better? |
28 |
|
29 |
I do not believe that munging is a bad thing. I'll even go so far as to |
30 |
say that I think it's a good thing. (This can turn into a long running |
31 |
discussion that likely doesn't belong on the Gentoo-User mailing list.) |
32 |
|
33 |
IMHO the biggest issue is that the messages aren't munged enough. From |
34 |
also needs to be munged to make the message appear to be from a |
35 |
different address. (Ideally one that the mailing list owns.) |
36 |
|
37 |
I also think that any security headers that exist on the incoming |
38 |
message should be removed as messages come into the mailing list and |
39 |
certainly before going out from the mailing list. |
40 |
|
41 |
- ARC-* |
42 |
- Authentication-Results |
43 |
- DKIM-* |
44 |
|
45 |
Removing these extra headers should help ensure that they don't |
46 |
accidentally get mis-interpreted by servers receiving messages from the |
47 |
mailing list manager. |
48 |
|
49 |
I have created a new email address in a sub-domain and (re)subscribed to |
50 |
the Gentoo-User mailing list with it and unsubscribed my main email |
51 |
address. This new sub-domain has a different DMARC policy ("NONE" |
52 |
instead of "REJECT") and I'm hoping that it will minimize the number of |
53 |
messages that get bounced. (This is the first time I'm testing it, so I |
54 |
may not have things correctly configured for the new sub-domain yet.) |
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
|
58 |
-- |
59 |
Grant. . . . |
60 |
unix || die |