Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@×××××××××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Bouncing Messages
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 22:51:50
Message-Id: 5dc7f190-80c6-62e8-4bed-8737b974641f@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Bouncing Messages by Ian Zimmerman
1 On 03/02/2018 09:36 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
2 > These are all from Grant Taylor. They are DKIM-signed, and, not
3 > surprisingly given the list header and footer munging, signature
4 > verification fails (on my mail server).
5
6 Correct. DKIM verification is failing and my DMARC policy is configured
7 to REJECT messages that fail DKIM or SPF tests.
8
9 The reason that messages are being rejected is because of the DMARC
10 policy. 1) I publish DMARC records and 2) Gmail honor published DMARC
11 records.
12
13 The same type of problem will happen with any other sending domain that
14 publishes REJECT records to a recipient where the receiving server
15 honors said REJECT records.
16
17 This is not just me. More and more sending domains are publishing DMARC
18 records and more and more receiving servers are honoring said records.
19 Further, multiple governments are mandating that governmental agencies
20 and sub-contractors implement DMARC (which also means DKIM and SPF).
21 The US and Germany come to mind immediately. - This is a growing
22 change in the email industry. - I just happen to live towards (but not
23 on) the bleeding edge of email.
24
25 > Munging by lists should just die. Why do it? Windoze and Goo users may
26 > have to split their mail into folders by Subject, but surely Gentooers
27 > know better?
28
29 I do not believe that munging is a bad thing. I'll even go so far as to
30 say that I think it's a good thing. (This can turn into a long running
31 discussion that likely doesn't belong on the Gentoo-User mailing list.)
32
33 IMHO the biggest issue is that the messages aren't munged enough. From
34 also needs to be munged to make the message appear to be from a
35 different address. (Ideally one that the mailing list owns.)
36
37 I also think that any security headers that exist on the incoming
38 message should be removed as messages come into the mailing list and
39 certainly before going out from the mailing list.
40
41 - ARC-*
42 - Authentication-Results
43 - DKIM-*
44
45 Removing these extra headers should help ensure that they don't
46 accidentally get mis-interpreted by servers receiving messages from the
47 mailing list manager.
48
49 I have created a new email address in a sub-domain and (re)subscribed to
50 the Gentoo-User mailing list with it and unsubscribed my main email
51 address. This new sub-domain has a different DMARC policy ("NONE"
52 instead of "REJECT") and I'm hoping that it will minimize the number of
53 messages that get bounced. (This is the first time I'm testing it, so I
54 may not have things correctly configured for the new sub-domain yet.)
55
56
57
58 --
59 Grant. . . .
60 unix || die

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Bouncing Messages Ian Zimmerman <itz@××××××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-user] Bouncing Messages Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>