1 |
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 09:02:24PM +0000, Wols Lists wrote |
2 |
> On 10/12/17 10:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
3 |
> > I've no idea how good systemd is. It's not been through the normal |
4 |
> > process of choice and selection that other successful packages have. |
5 |
> > It was forced on people. But being forced to have a binary system log, |
6 |
> > being forced (so I have heard) to have an http server running, ...., |
7 |
> > doesn't make it an attractive package for me. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Oddly enough, although the details are different, that passage I've |
10 |
> quoted pretty accurately describes how I feel about Gnome ... :-) |
11 |
|
12 |
I can't find it right now on Google, but I vaguely remember that |
13 |
Lennart asked the Gnome people to make systemd a hard dependancy. Not |
14 |
much later logind, which is required by Gnome, picks up systemd as a |
15 |
hard dependancy. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
19 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |