1 |
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:14 AM Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Hund wrote: |
4 |
> > On June 1, 2021 3:38:30 PM GMT+02:00, n952162 <n952162@×××.de> wrote: |
5 |
> >> 337 packages this month to be updated. It keeps getting more and |
6 |
more. |
7 |
> >> Pretty soon, gentoo will overtake Bitcoin in energy use. |
8 |
> >> |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> > One might then ask why you have so many packages? And why you have a |
11 |
computer that consumes enough power for you to be worried about it? |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > -- |
14 |
> > Hund |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I was thinking along the lines of how many packages even binary distros |
20 |
> have to update. I've installed binary based distros before and when |
21 |
> updating those, there can be hundreds, several hundred, packages to |
22 |
> upgrade. Thing is, those same packages exist in Gentoo. If one has a |
23 |
> very similar set of packages installed, odds are, almost the same |
24 |
> packages will update in either a source based distro like Gentoo or in a |
25 |
> binary based distro. The only difference is Gentoo compiles from source. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> If one is really concerned about compile times or the amount of power |
28 |
> needed to run Gentoo up to date, then one has to question not the |
29 |
> updates but why use Gentoo?? While some large packages are available in |
30 |
> binary, Firefox, Libreoffice etc, the vast majority of Gentoo is |
31 |
> compiled from source. It's why most people use Gentoo, compile from |
32 |
> source with features set like you want. If one is limited in hardware |
33 |
> or power, Gentoo may not be a good option. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Makes one think. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Dale |
38 |
> |
39 |
> :-) :-) |
40 |
|
41 |
I totally get why the Linux enthusiast or an IT guy tasked with specific |
42 |
requirements runs Gentoo. I did from 2001 through maybe early 2018. |
43 |
|
44 |
There are numerous reasons I moved from Gentoo to Kubuntu 3-4 years ago: |
45 |
|
46 |
- Kubuntu updates take, in general, less than 1 minute, almost never more |
47 |
than 5, with an average of 2-3/week. I don't believe I spend more than 10 |
48 |
minutes on average any week maintaining my machines. Most important to me |
49 |
is in 3-4 years not a single one has failed. Download a little binary, |
50 |
install, done. Distribution updates (major rev -> major rev) take less than |
51 |
an hour and this is once a year or two. They are so infrequent that I |
52 |
typically forget how to do them and have to go read instructions. |
53 |
|
54 |
- Maintaining a simple Gentoo install with no desktop from source wasn't |
55 |
bad but the KDE overhead on older laptops was insane for my needs. |
56 |
|
57 |
- I personally could not perceive any speed advantages in my daily life |
58 |
running Gentoo. I'm sure there would be some if I was into benchmarking but |
59 |
I'm not. |
60 |
|
61 |
- Gentoo lost its way (IN MY OPINION ONLY, and maybe it's better now) 4-5 |
62 |
years ago in terms of a simple 'stable' release. There was a time when I |
63 |
couldn't update without ~amd64-ing some packages. |
64 |
|
65 |
- I use two paid-for non-open source applications - Harrison Mixbus (based |
66 |
on Ardour) and PixInsight. It's WAY easier to get support when running the |
67 |
same distro these vendor runs and it's been a BIG help in my life to get |
68 |
that support. |
69 |
|
70 |
Sadly, I don't have nearly the knowledge of how things work under the |
71 |
hood on Kubuntu and the user level community is very quiet so I try to make |
72 |
general contributions here just to stay connected. This is still the best |
73 |
user group I know of. Friendly, informative experts. |
74 |
|
75 |
Just my 1.5 cents worth as I listen to Hunky Dory, |
76 |
Mark |